A Loyalist Or A Patriot? – Updated…

In Response To Phil Restino’s Most Recent Article, P&M

Received The Following Letter…

To whom it may concern

As a friend and suppporter of Mr. Phil Restino in his efforts
for peace and for good government, I highly recommend that you
publish his letter to the editor on patriotism.  His focus is
on the true spirit of American democracy and on the values on
which our nation was founded.  Mr. Restino is more than an academic
thinker; he is an activist for the values of which he writes.
He has spent countless hours on street corners demonstrating his
belief in the USA and its highest standards of ethics.  He has
spoken directly to the officials who represent us in Washingon,
D.C.  I am proud of my association with Phil Restino and grateful
that he takes his stand, expressing the values which will keep our
nation strong and free.

Sincerely,

s/Stanley Howard Schwartz

STANLEY HOWARD SCHWARTZ
Chaplain (MAJ) US Army, Retired
AB, BHL, MAHL, Rabbi (Reform), DD
(Ordained at the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion,
Cincinnati, Ohio, June 1969;
Doctorate awarded there in March 1994)
109 Powderhorn Court
Daytona Beach, FL 32119-1464
Rabbi, Temple Israel of Deland, FL
Chaplain, VITAS Innovative Hospice, Ormond Beach, FL
386-671-2792 VITAS office

A Loyalist Or A Patriot?…

 

Veterans For Peace, Inc.
Central Florida / Central Florida East
P.O. Box 9012, Daytona Beach, FL 32120-9012
Ph: (386) 255-7441; Fax: (386) 255-7442
Email: CentralFlaVFP@aol.com
www.cflveteransforpeace.org

 

“To stand in silence when they should be protesting

makes cowards out of men.” – President Abraham Lincoln

 

November 14, 2006

 

 

 

A patriot, a loyalist, or worse yet?
By Philip C. Restino

 

The recent passage of the Military Commissions Act of 2006

eliminated Habeas Corpus, a detainee’s right to know the charges

for his detainment and his right to defend himself against those

charges in a Court of Law. The Act not only allows information

coerced by means of torture to be incriminating, but it also

retroactively changes the law so as to protect anyone in the Bush

Administration and under their command from prosecution for

war crimes dating back to September 11, 2001. Habeas Corpus

originated in the year 1215 and was shamelessly removed from

the American way of life by President Bush “The Decider” on

October 17, 2006. The vague language of the Military Commissions

Act also allows the President to decide what qualifies one as an

“enemy combatant” and to whom that qualification applies, to include

American citizens. All to protect us from terrorism.

 

The Military Commissions Act of 2006 is eerily similar to Germany’s

Enabling Act of 1933, the passage of which followed Germany’s own

“9/11″ in the burning of its Parliament building, the Reichstag, on

February 27, 1933. The 1933 Enabling Act allowed Germany’s own

“Decider” Adolf Hitler to take that country from one of a people’s

parliamentary government into one of a fascist dictatorship and into

the horrors of Nazism that spread throughout Europe for the next 12

years. The rationale given to the German people in 1933 for the removal

of their liberties was that dictatorial powers were necessary to protect

them from terrorism. Our own liberties have been removed for the

very same reason. Shouldn’t we be paying attention here?

 

The Reichstag Fire was blamed on a Communist “terrorist”,

Marinis Vanderlubbe, who was quickly tried in a show trial,

similar to the ones provided for in the language of the Military

Commissions Act of 2006 which our so-called “representatives”

in Congress voted for and which “The Decider” ceremoniously

signed into law on October 17th. It was after World War II during

the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials of 1945, that strong evidence

emerged indicating that German SS operatives had set the

Reichstag fire. Also at Nuremberg, Nazi Reich Marshall Hermann

Goering made the following statement that can easily be attributed

to the Bush Administration’s strategy for control over the past five

years, and that was “The people can always be brought to the

bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them

they are being attacked and denounce the peacemakers for lack

of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the

same in any country.”

 

I encourage the reader to turn off your television set and learn

about the Military Commissions Act of 2006, the Patriot Acts,

the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act of 2007

which now allows for our “Decider” to declare Martial Law without

States’ consent, and then take a few minutes to read the Bill of

Rights, if not the entire U.S. Constitution. For those of you who

refuse to listen to anything unless it’s from a member of the “Party

of Lincoln”, consider the following from President Lincoln himself:

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter

and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”

And to those of you sycophants masquerading as “love it or leave it”

Americans living in our “land of the free and home of the brave”,

Lincoln had this to say: “To stand in silence when they should be

protesting makes cowards out of men.”

 

A patriot is defined as a person who loves his or her country.

Waving the flag and blindly submitting oneself as an unquestioning

loyalist to individuals who have taken charge of the government,

in our case a government “of, by and for the people” as President

Lincoln described on the bloody fields of Gettysburg, does not make

one a patriot. Being a loyalist is easy. Being a patriot takes the courage

to speak out in protest, albeit courage that any one of us can muster.

Mark Twain wrote, “In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a

scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause

succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.”

During these very troubling times in our country’s history when our

basic liberties are under attack, will you choose to be a patriot, a

loyalist or worse yet, will you continue to sit it out?

 

For those of you choosing to continue to “sit it out”, consider

German Pastor Martin Niemöller’s reflections on the rise of the

Nazi’s under Adolf Hitler in the 1930’s. He wrote, “In Germany

they came first for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up

because I wasn’t a Communist. Then they came for the Jews,

and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came

for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t

a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t

speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me,

and by that time no one was left to speak up.”

 

Note: Restino is co-chair and a founding member of the Central

Florida chapter of Veterans For Peace and a member of Military

Families Speak Out – Florida. He lives in Daytona Beach.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or

that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only

unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American

public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or anyone

else.” – President Theodore Roosevelt

Leave a Reply